THE IMPACT OF THE MULTIGRADE TEACHING TRAINING CONDUCTED IN KABWE , CENTRAL PROVINCE, FROM ---------------------- TO -------------------
Responses to questions for PEOs PSOs, etc
A. STATISTRUAL INFORMATION
1) Total number of Multigrade schools in the Province
2) Total number of Multigrade teachers in the province ..
3) Total number of teachers trained in Multigrade teaching .
4) Total number of pupils in Multigrade schools ..
A. RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS
1) Satisfied with work in Multigrade schools
Yes No Undecided
2) Problems experienced by Multigrade schools.
1. ..
2.
3. .
4. .
3) Suggestions on how the system can be sustained.
1. ..
2. .
3. ..
4. ..
4) Description of project proposal to sustain and ensure continuing of the system.
1. ..
2. ..
3. ..
4. ..
QUESTIONNAIRE ON MULTIGRADE TEACHING IN SCHOOLS IN THE CENTRAL PROVINCE
(To be completed by Inspectors and Head teachers)
The purpose of administering this questionnaire is three- fold- namely:-
(a) To collect relevant data in order to asses the impact of the multigrade teaching training which had been conducted for teachers;
(b) To help improve the work of the Multigrade Teaching Project in the Province; and
© To help provide information to a variety of stake- holders about the performance of the project.
The respondents are required to indicate responses of their choice by ticking appropriate boxes or by making brief comments of statements as requested for. Honest responses will not only the helpful but will make this exercise a great success. Please note that this is not a test or an examination.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name of district
2. Name of respondent ..
3. Inspector for District.
4. Head teacher for school.
B. STATISTUAL DATA (FOR INSPECTORS ONLY)
1. Total number of Multigrade Schools in the district
2. Total number of Multigrade teachers in the district
3. Total number of pupils in Multigrade school in the district
B. QUESTIONS
1. Are you familiar with the Multigrade system of teaching Yes No
2. How many of your teachers attended the training? Number of teachers.
3. Have you tried to Asses the work of training? Yes No
4. If your response to question 3 above is YES, how would you assess the quality of teaching and learning now?
(a) It has improved Yes
(b) It has nor improved. NO
5. Indicate some reasons to support your response to question 4 above by selecting appropriate statements from the following:
(a) Teachers are now applying Multigrade teaching methods effectively.
(b) Teachers are effectively using the materials they received during the training.
(c) Teachers have become more resourceful in their work.
(d) Pupils written work has improved.
(e) Individual pupil or group attention is being handled more effectively now.
(f) Pupils spirits of self reliance and independent study has become stronger.
(g) Pupils lesson participation has improved.
(h) Peer tutoring has improved significantly.
(i) Pupils are learning more effectively.
(j) Pupils test or examination results have improved.
(k) Class discipline has improved.
(l) Teachers are not applying what they learnt
(m) Required teaching/materials are not available.
(n) Teachers did not attend the course
(o) Teachers are not familiar with the Multigrade system of teaching.
(p) Any other reasons
1.
2. .
3. ..
6. Do you think the training has had a good impact on the performance of your :-
(a) Teachers? Yes No
(b) Pupils ? Yes No
(c) Schools ? Yes No
7. Have you any suggestions to make on the training of Multigrade teachers or any other related subject?
1.
2.
3. ..
7. List some aspects of the teachers work, if any which were most successful.
1 ..
2 .
3
4.
9. List some aspect of the teachers work, if any which presented a lot of difficulties or problems.
1.
2.
3
4
10. Was the training worthwhile in relation to its cost?
Yes No Undecided
11. Do you think the training achieved the intended objectives?
Yes No Undecided
12. Are Multigrade schools doing better now than before as a result of the training ?
Thank you very much for your Co-operation and assistance.
Questionnaire on Multigrade teaching in schools in the Central Province
Response to questions for Inspectors and Headteachers
|
Question |
Yes |
No |
Undecided |
|
1. Familiar with the system |
|
|
|
|
3. Assessing work of teachers |
|
|
|
|
4. Improvement of quality of teaching /
Learning. |
|
|
|
|
6. Training having a good impact on:
(a) Teachers
(b) Pupils
© Schools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Training worthwhile in relation to
its cost. |
|
|
|
|
11. Achievement of intended training
Objective |
|
|
|
|
12. Multigrade schools doing better now |
|
|
|
Evaluation questionnaire for workshops on Multigrade teaching to be conducted in different schools in the Central Province from 19th October to 3rd November, 2002.
________________________________________________________________________
(To be completed by Inspectors, Headteachers and teachers in the Central Province)
The main purpose of administering this questionnaire is to collect relevant data in order to evaluate the workshops, which are to be conducted in different schools in the Central Province from 19th October to 3rd November, 2002.
The respondents are required to indicate responses of their choice by ticking the appropriate boxes or by making brief comments or suggestions as requested for. Honest responses will not only be helpful but will make this exercise a great success. Please note that this is not a test or an examination.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name of district
2. Name of respondent
3. Post/title/ designation:
Inspector Headteacher Teacher
B. QUESTIONS.
1. The purpose of holding the workshop was to up-grade participants knowledge, skills, etc in Multigrade teaching so that they can work more efficiently in their schools.
- Were you aware of this objective? Yes No
2. Do you think the above objective was appropriate for the workshop?
Yes No
3. Was the subject matter for the workshop appropriate? Yes No
4. How would you rate the method of presentation of the subject matter for the workshop? Poor Good Very Good
5. Were workshop activities, if any interesting and beneficial?
Yes No Undecided
6. Were the demonstration lessons interesting, relevant and beneficial?
Yes No Undecided
7. What is your opinion about the usefulness of the Multigrade Teaching Manual?
and the pupils Activity Book? They are:-
Not useful Useful
8. How would you rate the quality of discussion during the workshop?
Poor Good Very good
9. Do you think the subject matter for the workshop was adequate for the period?
No Yes Undecided
10. List some topics, if any you have not understood well.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
11. Has the workshop achieved the intended objective indicated in question No 1?
Yes No
12. Has the workshop been beneficial?
Yes No
13. Would you recommend similar workshops to be held in future ?
Yes No
14. Have you, any suggestions to make on the training of Multigrade teachers?
(a) ...
(b) .
(c) .
(d) ..
15. Have you any suggestions on how the Multigrade system of teaching can be strengthened so that it can continue doing well for a very long time to come?
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Thank you very much for your Co-operation and assistance.
Evaluation questionnaire for workshops on Multigrade teaching to be conducted in different school in the Central Province from 19th October to 3rd November, 2002.
_________________________________________________________________________
Responses to questions for Inspectors, Headteachers and Teachers.
|
Question |
Yes |
No |
Undecided |
Poor |
Good |
V. Good |
|
1. Being aware of the workshop objective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Appropriateness of the workshop objective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Appropriateness of the workshop objective matter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Method of presentation of workshop subject matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Workshop activities interesting, and beneficial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Demonstration lessons interesting, relevant and beneficial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Usefulness of multigrade Manual and pupils Activity Books |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Quality of discussions during workshops |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Adequacy of subject matter for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Achievement of intended workshop objective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.Workshop being beneficial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Recommending similar workshops |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of the Multigrade Teaching Training workshops to be conducted in Kabwe, Central Province, from 19th October to 3rd November, 2002.
Questions for parents and local community members
1. Are you happy with what is going on at your school (e.g. in terms of teaching and
learning activities) ?
2 How good is the working relationship between the school, on one hand, and the parents and local community members on the other hand?
3. In your opinion, what kind of problems is the school experiencing and how can they be solved.
4. What kind of improvements would you like to see at your school?
5. What kind of plans (short term and long term) do you have for your school?
The impact of the Multigrade Teaching Training workshops to be conducted in Kabwe, Central Province, from 19th October to 3rd November, 2002.
Responses to questions for parents and local community members.
1. Being happy with work going on at the school Yes No
2. Working relationship between the school and parents/local community members.
Poor Good V. Good
3. Problems/ difficulties experienced by the school
1.
2. ..
3.
4.
4. Suggestions on how to improve the school.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Suggestions on plans (short term and long term ) to improve the school.
1.
2.
3.
4.
The impact of the Multigrade Teaching Training conducted in Kabwe, Central Province, form ------------------------------------------ to ---------------------------------------------
Lesson observation instrument
(Five point side for scoring)
1. Achievement of lesson objective 1 2 3 4 5
2 Adequacy and arrangement of content material
for the lesson 1 2 3 4 5
3. Quality of teaching: Methodology, integration of
subjects, activities, use of aids, features of Multigrade
teaching, etc 1 2 3 4 5
4. Quality of learning: Pupils attention, child-
centeredness, participation, activities,
integrative learning, etc. 1 2 3 4 5
5. Standard of achievement displayed in the lesson:
Pupils work, activities, etc. 1 2 3 4 5
